If the sights were dialled in for that specific load and distance, it’d be a draw, with the score in the mid-forties as well. The American Eagle was a solid performer and for general purpose applications we’d recommend it on account of the combination of bullet, accuracy, and reloadable brass. Ruger SP101 vs GP100: Reckoning Of The Ruger Revolvers. The SP101 is a small frame, 5 shot comparable to the J frame 60. Despite the 10mm’s reputation for power, the Ruger GP100 Match Champion is all about speed. Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. This applies to handguns, long guns shotguns……whatever. This is admittedly a small sample size, but my research and experience with other examples of each has solidified my opinion that both guns will shoot equally well with appropriate loads. The Smith 686 shot a one and three-quarter inch group at 25 yards with the Winchester with one called flyer which we pulled two inches right; the entire group was surprisingly left of centre however, and we can’t support anything left of centre, just out of principle. It can hold more rounds at once, it is more easily customizable, and the accuracy is better. If you don’t care to immediately start modifying a new gun in order to enjoy the benefits of a nice action, the 686 would be the better choice, or you would be best advised to purchase an upgraded GP100. Both revolvers are capable of very good mechanical accuracy. In general if it feels GREAT and is reliable, consistent, and accurate, and works for you, I have to say if it is not broke it does not need fixing! The throats in Ruger’s cylinders were not on the level with S&W’s. No Gun Smith has ever touched any internal parts. I have the 686 and the GP100. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. The more you will enjoy shooting it and it will also let you shoot the weapon more accurately. Hammer spurs on both are well knurled, and easy to grasp. Both guns were bought used, with our own cash, the sellers having no ties to the manufacturers. The Ruger GP100 Match Champion is a unique six-gun that offers a great deal to the discerning shooter…with the added bonus of moon clip sweetness. A somewhat blunter instrument, the Ruger GP100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six in 1985. By entering your e-mail you consent to subscribe to my newsletter. However, the Ruger action can be cleaned up significantly, and will improve through repeated use. I have owned all the Glock 9mm’s (G43, G26, G19, G17, G34), Ruger LC9S, Sig P238, SP101, LCR38, Ruger MarkIII 22/45, Walter PPK/S, Ruger LCP, LCP Custom, and S&W 642 PC Enhanced Action (no IL). Archived. If you want to carry a wheel gun but need something that's with a bit more beef than the standard snubby, two guns that will come up in your search are the Ruger SP101 vs GP100… I once had the opportunity to compare both the GP100 and 686 with 4in barrels, firing both from bench rests in single-action mode at known distance targets at 25 and 50 yards. At around 2.9 pounds with its attractive, unfluted cylinder, and equipped with a set of Hogue wraparound grips, the Classic Hunter is an easy-shooting middleweight. There’s no sense of “stacking” which occasionally manifests in the coil spring of the Ruger. Not that we allow manufacturers to influence our content, but you know what they say: there’s a need for justice to be done, and a need for justice to be seen to be done. The stock 686 has a clear advantage over the GP100 here: out of the box, the trigger of the 686 is smoother, with noticeably less stacking and a cleaner break in double-action and a precise, short single-action pull. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. is one of the nation's leading manufacturers of rugged, reliable firearms for the commercial sporting market. The 686 has its cylinder release located immediately to the rear of the cylinder, in line with the bore, and is pressed forward toward the muzzle to release the cylinder. We put nine B-2 targets on each backing board and went to work, shooting reloads, factory ammo, and then unwinding each time with casual fire through a reference pistol – in this case the FNS-9 we’ve been using for long term testing. It features a sideplate on the stainless-steel frame which is removed for service and disassembly, a conventional grip arrangement, and a flat mainspring. BudsGunShop.com $572.00 - $617.00 See Deal GunCritic Score More Info. Bearcat: Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:56 pm Posts: 43 From a novice doing his … The GP100 … One can shoot 500-1K of rounds (like in a semi-auto) will do a lot of polishing and you do not need any gun smithing or special tools or any tools at all. But we’ll do our best not to drool all over it. We reserved most of our efforts for the factory ammo, since our handloads were never meant to be more than cheap bulk plinking fuel. Well, it was a draw, Colt was off due to price though Bill was luck6 to own it. … For some reason, in the early eighties, there was a pervasive belief that the 110 JHP was the ultimate manstopper; later testing did not bear this theory out but it’s still a cool round and deserves a place in any collector’s heart. Just one opinion from an old Purple Heart grunt. you only 1 special tool to fully disassemble a Ruger double action revolver. But over the past 10-15 years S&W quality appears to have decreased. If you’re thinking of buying the new Ruger … If you like the Smith and Wesson’s fantastic trigger feel and looks, and don’t mind that you’re paying extra for a gun that is almost the exact functional equivalent of the Ruger GP100, well, it’s hard to argue against that either. The Ruger GP100 comes equipped with a 4.2 inch, slab-sided bull barrel. And if you guys think the GP-100 is as accurate as the 1980’s S&W 686, I suggest you buy your guns at a gun store, do a test and give us real data. And, we suppose, they’re more fun to photograph when they look different, plus the fact that a blued Ruger GP100 was easier to find than a stainless one, so one’s silver and one’s black. The Ruger’s (left) was only 1.38 inches wide while the S&W’s (right) measured 1.88 … The first most important thing about any firearm is it must feel good in your grip! The GP100 was something of a departure from traditional revolver designs of the time, but benefits from it in several ways. In both cases we found the Blazer ammo to be very controllable and the Winchester to be the least predictable. Other than say going from a single shot to something else for example. Maybe it’s just me, but I’m not seeing it. I can place a dime on the front of the barrel behind the front site and dry fire DA and the dime does not move. Rugers are solid sidewall guns (no plates) while S&W’s have fake, screwed-on sidewall plates. Is either superior to the other, or is this one of the classic “six of one, half dozen of the other” arguments? If you ever get into the content business, whether it’s online, in print, or in TV, you’ll realize something very quickly: one of the … Neither has any great advantage in the area of controls. While it is the rare revolver whose parts require no fitting and adjustment for proper function, the design of the Ruger makes repair and correction of issues somewhat easier. If I had to choose one, or make a decisive recommendation, it would boil down to degrees of advantage: The Ruger has a stronger action, but you should be honest with yourself if you have any need to take full advantage of that strength. The Ruger GP100 at 25 yards shot a slightly better group, the widest spread between rounds being two and a half inches. Personally, I believe the Ruger brand is top notch and at the end of the day, they are both glorious weapons. In double action shooting, it would be tough. I have a question about Colt and the Pythons………..I have heard that at least for a short while Colt was producing some Pythons with internal parts that were subject to breakage. Either are available in enhanced trim, with smoothed actions, accurized barrels and extended or smoothed controls, though Smith & Wesson has more custom variants available than Ruger from the factory, with their Performance Center lineup. Either one of the others comes down to personal preference. They even have the same twist rate: 1:18.75”. The .357 Magnum I expect this sixgun to be the most popular of the Lipsey’s/Ruger GP100 Trio, as next to a good .22 everyone should have a quality .357 Magnum and that’s … Let’s get to it and take a closer look at the GP100 family. models. Sights vary on these guns depending on the model, but both can accept aftermarket front and rear sights, with the GP100 having a small perk here due to its easily uninstalled front sight. But that’s about it. Aside from being two of the most common among fullsize revolvers, both are renowned for their accuracy and reliability. It would also be very accurate, and have an action that would be hard-wearing, and would maintain its smooth, manageable trigger over a long time. What did we learn? Am I correct? The factory ammo was from American Eagle, Blazer, and Winchester. I believe out of the Box the S&W trigger is slightly better. We don’t claim to be particularly adept shooters with revolvers (in fact we spend so much time with service pistols we have to consciously decide to move our support hand back to avoid blasting the tip of our thumb with hot gases from the cylinder gap) but three inch groups at 15 yards were easy enough and two inch groups readily achievable. Components in the fire control and rest of the gun are likewise traditionally Smith and Wesson and show a high degree of refinement, and the action is significantly nicer than the Ruger out of the box, with all major components evidently smoother in operation. But the Ruger GP100 is legendarily durable, and the accuracy of each gun is so similar that the overwhelming majority of shooters will never notice a difference. I've boiled it down to being between the Ruger GP100 … Buy the GP100. It’s well executed, with no rough edges or gross tool marks. The GP100 was the successor to Ruger’s Security Six and Speed Six pistols, but uses a … So which is your favorite? just the fact that you can field strip a GP100 and truly clean the trigger group win’s it for me. The Ruger GP100 GP-141 38 Special +P/357 Magnum, $480, is the fourth 4-inch handgun in the test.The GP100 line was introduced in 1985 as a second generation of the Ruger double-action, exposed-hammer revolvers intended to replace Ruger’s … As you are probably already thinking, this revolver is not a fantasy. Subjectively, the trigger on the Smith and Wesson is hard not to like. Certainly, if the shooter does their part and with proper load selection, either gun will deliver all the accuracy required for any endeavor. The B-2 has a three inch black circle which makes it an easy aiming spot, and the scoring rings make it a little quicker to assess performance. The addition of weight without cause makes a gun that is made for hunting, hiking, camping and fishing too heavy to be practical for anything except shooting at a range. However, the GP100 is … If comparing enhanced guns, it is a dead heat, although Smith and Wesson still has an edge, but only just. Cabela's $749.99 See Deal Ruger GP100. Or…..well, you get the idea. Drawing from that gun as a basis, and blending a little DNA from its cousin, the .44 Magnum Redhawk, Ruger created something new: a robustly framed service revolver, one with no sideplate (like the Security Six) and featuring triple-locking of the cylinder, thanks to the lever arrangement of the crane borrowed from the Redhawk. Unsurprisingly, the 110 grain ammo hit lower than the heavier 158s on account of the bullet leaving the barrel earlier in the recoil cycle; it’s soft-shooting ammo but the Ruger GP100 did not like it at all. Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686. The better a weapon feels in your hands/ or arms with long guns/shotguns. Ruger GP100. The Ruger GP100 .44 Special is a sizable, powerful-looking gun. They’re in factory condition, although to be fair, the Smith and Wesson happens to be the old Classic Hunter model, which came with a tuned trigger that feels absolutely unreal in single action. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… Everyone has their opinion, and, thankfully, the gun manufacturers have produced firearms that fit most people’s preferences and needs. Ruger GP100 357 Magnum. Nevertheless, bone stock, the 686 is better. This is partly due to the coil mainspring of the Ruger compared to the traditional flat mainspring of the S&W, and partly due to the superior overall fitment and finishing found on the fire control components of the 686. Back in the 80s, the 686 beat the socks off of the GP-100 and my Security-Six! If I got a Ruger GP 100, it would be right next to the S&W. In addition, Ruger dispensed with the traditional design of the grip on the frame, and instead created a sort of peg that holds the mainspring and hammer strut, and allows great flexibility in the size of grips, large or small, to be installed. A battle of the Titans so to speak. Ruger GP100 & S&W Model 69 Both of the guns turned in nice groups with Sig’s 200-grain V-Crown JHPs. But we’re amazed just how similar they are. Sometimes that’s very valuable: there are always new products coming out and someone has to research and test and investigate them if consumer at large are going to be able to make informed choices about how to spend their money. My friends and I compared his GP100, a Colt Python, and the 586 at the range one day. For my money, I could flip a coin and be entirely satisfied with either. The current company posing as s&w forgot how to make a … The Blazer was impressively accurate and softer on recoil, but the aluminum cases are single-use only as far as we know. They did I it because, one, Bill Ruger was either dead or he wasn’t himself, and two, S&W upgraded their guns to be more durable and decided to make them look like the Colt Pyhon, and Ruger decided to jump on the bandwagon. Of all these, I still enjoy my GP-100 the most for range shooting. Posted by 5 years ago. For more than 70 years, Ruger … We all agreed to a draw. I prefer Rugers and normally give them the edge FOR MY PURPOSES…..which may vary but I want the strongest and toughest and most reliable at reasonable cost that fits my grip or in my arms I can get….NOT because I do a lot of shooting or with normal or HOT Loads. Both will serve well in a defensive role, concealed or not, or for hunting and competition. For the tinkerer without real gunsmithing skills, the GP100 may be a better choice, as detail disassembly and reassembly is somewhat simpler than the classic Smith and Wesson revolvers. Perhaps, but being rugged has limitations. But when the scores are that close, tracing any difference to the gun rather than the shooter is almost certainly a mistake. Right next to both of them is a Redhawk in 45 Colt and it’s better than both and then I pick up a Ruger LCR and it has the best double action trigger of any revolver in the store. There’s just no wrong answer when it comes to flagship .357 magnums. I purchased a 686 + about 2 years ago and decided on a 3 inch barrel. Bass Pro Shops $749.99 See Deal Ruger GP100. I have a GP-100 and it is my favorite range handgun. 3 Reasons Why a Ruger GP100 IS Stronger than a Smith & Wesson 686? Geordie Pickard. Both have high-visibility and ruggedized options available from the factory. Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686 as a first revolver? S&W 586 is my preferred revolver. I know people say Ruger DAs are stronger than their SA counterparts (.44 mag Redhawk vs. Blackhawk, for instance), so I wonder: Is a .357 "mid frame" (50th Anniv) BH really stronger than a GP100… Close. The S&W 686 was far better accuracy and the action was far better than what a Ruger can ever be. Back in the day, S&W had better triggers than Ruger. The entire gun, once the grip is removed, can be detail stripped with no sideplate removal required. Required fields are marked *. There have been many legendarily excellent wheelguns come and go over the years, but few have codified the modern revolver as well as the Ruger GP100 and Smith & Wesson Model 686. The Ruger Trigger is a very good trigger and can be improved with some simple DIY work. I like the gun and it shoots well. With products made in America, Ruger offers consumers almost 800 … That nomination is of course entirely preference, subjective, and in no way a slight to the 686. Anyone have any info on this? If one was to conceive of an excellent all-purpose fullsize revolver today, what would it look like? The Ruger, on the other hand, has been shot enough to have smoothed out nicely, and the double action trigger is nothing to be embarrassed about in its own right. But sometimes, maybe, you’ll want to do things a little differently. I was very disappointed in Ruger’s decision to beg up a gun that already was as strong as it needed to be. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. As for barrel length, the 6" is the better choice for hunting, longer sight plane, more weight … I myself would have the stock GP100 trigger improved, considering that a good DA pull is essential for fast and accurate shooting with a revolver as a defensive arm. Match Champion has the best trigger pull…. Their balance superb, and I wouldn’t swap one for a GP-100, ever. I recall a test conducted back in the late 1980’s, comparing the accuracy potential of the Ruger against the Smith and Wesson in a Ransom rest. This is thanks to a clever spring loaded plunger arrangement, allowing a quick and simple change of front sight. In the end it’s just going to come down to consumer preference: if you like the Ruger’s reputation for brute durability and the frequently lower purchase price, and you don’t mind the book-length dissertation on safety they stamp into the barrel shroud, definitely go that route. While a few iterations have been controversial, like the internal keyed locking system added in the early 2000’s, the 686 shows the considerable refinement that Smith & Wesson is known for, and enjoys terrific popularity. S&W’s have those crummy, cheap screwed on side plates. Quality is there and the finish is outstanding. It’s worth noting that the GP100 has consistently been a top-10 selling revolver over the years and peaked at number 1 in 2018 among all revolvers. Smooth action, strong and durable. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. How they’re doing now I don’t know. and the accuracy is Argument rages this very second over which is superior. The GP100 vs SP101: Which is Better For Personal Protection? So off we went to the firing line, stacks of targets in tow. Like the Glock 19, it is easier to maneuver indoors. When comparing the sizes of the GP100 and SP101, you might compare them to their S&W counterparts. The Winchester loads were classic 1980s cop loads: 110 grain jacketed hollow points. That does not mean that all the rest out there are not MISTER MURPHY Proof……It means I buy what I prefer and what I want, fits my hands or my arms with long guns, that works for me. Both are positive in operation and easy to operate. Post subject: Ruger Redhawk 8 Shot 357 vs Ruger GP100 7 Shot 357. I don’t shoot any 38’s because somebody, somewhere said it would leave a ring inside the cylinder. These are as similar as we could locate: both models are six inch, full underlug barrels. 2. I have been thinking about trading it for a Ruger GP100. The 686 is a highly rugged and durable gun, and will also withstand constant use of full-power .357 Magnum loads. At 15 yards, performance was so similar as to be ridiculous. They’re rugged, durable and they don’t need to be strengthened to last forever. 03-25 … I have had to remove the side plates on a S&W and do not look forward to doing that again anytime soon. The somewhat rougher trigger of the GP100 is a hindrance for fast, precise double-action work, though, and makes that accuracy potential harder to realize. The KGP-100 felt GREAT in my hand and no need for different grips. S&W has history on their side…Ruger has technology and innovation for a more rugged and reliable firearm. Why the company made the GP-100 is no mystery. 686affordableComparisonfirst gunGP100New shooterrevolverRugerRuger GP100Smith & WessonSmith 686wheelgun. 94%. Today, you will find no great advantage of one over the either when looking at variety. and that tool is a screwdriver blade with a hole EDM in it to remove the ejection rod. Bill Ruger said he never made a dime on the Security-Six and I believe it. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. I just don’t like the fact that there is another potential for problems with the gun’s functioning. As far as accuracy the Smith is the best…. You know…., when I pick up Smiths and Rivers at my LGS I’m just not seeing the “Smith triggers are much bettt” thing. Your e-mail is 100% safe. In retrospect, choosing two extremely similar revolvers and putting them head-to-head had a predictable outcome: they’re extremely similar. Not a tremendous advantage, but worth mentioning. In this article, I’ll examine the strengths and flaws of each and let you decide. These two beauties are examples of some of the most popular .357 magnum revolvers ever built: Ruger’s GP100, and Smith and Wesson’s 686. If we had had identical grips on each gun, could we have felt the difference in the dark? The Ruger's trigger can be worked to be better than a stock S&W trigger but,,, The GP100 I shot took forever for the hammer to fall, It is a longer trigger pull in DA and after shooting S&Ws for a … I also like both the Security Six and the GP100’s, I have a 4” and 6” of each, you can really feel the different of the weight in the full lug GP100 over the Security Six, all four are good built guns, the GP100’s are little larger and heavier to compete with the S&W L Frames back in the 80’s, of the ones I have the 4” GP100 … So let’s get rolling, and start feeding this brace of wheelguns a selection of rounds in .38spl and .357mag, and see which gun likes what, how, and maybe even why. Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686 as a first revolver? Longer barreled models with tuned actions can take full advantage of the .357 Magnum and give great performance as a hunting or home-defense gun. Better made and better resale value. With products made in America, Ruger offers consumers almost 800 variations of more than 40 product lines. I have a S&W Model 19 357 Mag with a 4" barrel. First let’s lay down some hard data for the sake of comparison. The GP100 … That’s why Rugers weigh more than do corresponding S&W handguns and that’s why Rugers are more rugged than are S&W’s. Whatever role you are looking to fill with a fullsize revolver, be it hunting, concealed carry, or general defense, both the 686 and GP100 have models to suit the task. August 26, 2017. The frame, lacking a sideplate and being over-built in typical Ruger fashion, is very strong compared even to the rugged 686. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681. For carry I use my 642. The GP100 has a release located in the exact same location, but is a button that hinges inward to release. After comparison, the GP100 is evaluated as the better pistol for personal protection and concealed carry. Models with short barrels, aggressively textured grips and combat sights are available from either maker, and would be fine guns for general concealed carry. One thing you mentioned in passing but didn’t emphasize enough is that most all of the S&W revolvers have sidewall plates attached by screws whereas the Rugers are solid steel and have no sidewall plates. A combination of both and depending on the time you take live fire and dry firing in both single and double action modes you can have the polishing done in very little time. If Smith & Wesson would get rid of that internal lock I would buy their revolver. This author has shot many examples of each over the years in various configurations and found the accuracy of one to be on par with the other. The GP100 trigger is approximately the same weight, but the travel is a little longer and feels heavier, with noticeable stacking about 2/3 of the way through the travel, with a little snag near the end in double-action, and a slightly gritty single-action break. Although the stainless-steel revolver features the Ruger family brushed satin finish, it’s … If you ever get into the content business, whether it’s online, in print, or in TV, you’ll realize something very quickly: one of the easiest ways to generate material is to look at new products. Were Smith triggers better in the past, All the guns I’m talking about are new? I don't know anything about the Ruger. At SHOT Show, we talked to Kurt Hindle, the product manager for the Match Champion. How can you improve on such a weapon? You fail to mention that one can polish the action of the GP-100 by lots of dry firing. The new GP100 Match Champion is Ruger’s first direct attempt at challenging that dominance. The American Eagle stuff was 158 grain jacketed soft point; the Blazer was full metal jacket in Blazer’s signature aluminum cases. We began by warming up with handloads as we can make them by the case lot; using cast lead semi-wadcutter 148 grain bullets and titegroup powder they’re practically free. I would gravitate to the GP100, as I already have several big-bore .44 caliber Ruger revolvers and would prefer to keep my guns as similar as possible. The six inch edition is virtually identical to the Classic Hunter in size and weight; with identical grips there would be no discernible difference in size and the weight discrepancy is a matter of grams. I will never SPAM you. In the meantime I will refrain from shooting .40 S&W in the 10mm GP100 and be content with using standard 10mm ammo, most of which is loaded near .40 S&W levels anyhow. The only logical solution is to get one of each. Today, we’re taking two old standbys, guns that could be found in a thousand safes across the country, and comparing them in terms of their accuracy, shootability, and construction. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. For those readers unfamiliar with a Ransom rest, it is a heavy mechanical vise fitted with an insert to hold a specific gun with absolute steadiness, and is used predominately for accuracy testing by removing the human element from the equation. Even in this age of the polymer striker-fired pistol, the wheelgun endures, and the two discussed here are among the very finest for serious shooters. The new Ruger GP100 Match King chambered in 10 mm is one of those best-of revolvers that the company's customers have been waiting for, including me! Easy to take down with a simple pin that is included in the grip. A very nice revolver, but not as smooth or refined as my 586. The stock Ruger is less expensive than the Smith and Wesson across most variants, usually by about a $100 or so, but if you are considering the cost of upgrading the trigger or purchasing a performance model to bring it to parity with the 686 per the above paragraph then the savings are nil. Can you give me some pro's and cons with the GP100 … Since I’ve had my S&W 686, 3 of my buddies traded their Rugers for S&W 686. Since then, there have been several design revisions tweaking and changing things about various components in the gun. If you are not shooting a constant diet of barn-burning maximum pressure loads through the gun, does it confer any benefit? That’s why Ruger revolvers weigh more than S&W revolvers and it’s also why Rugers are stronger guns….. For many it’s … As such, the next question is the really interesting one: how differently do they shoot? This is pure independent testing and we’re excited to bring it to you. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. is one of the nation's leading manufacturers of rugged, reliable firearms for the commercial sporting market. Rugers are solid guns with no cheap side plates. I have a model 66-8 Smith and a GP100 match champion If you prefer the no-nonsense design of the GP100 or the timeless, refined mechanism of the 686, both are deserving of your dollar, and your trust. Ruger SP101 22 S&W 617; Conclusion S&W 617 is generally the better choice. When it comes to accuracy, a revolver’s barrel is the foundation of performance. Comparing the triggers of tuned variants of either will reveal excellent, smooth, light double-action pulls, and shiveringly short and crisp single-action breaks. I’ll pick up a 686 plus and right next to it a GP100 Match Champion and im liking the Ruger trigger better. The Smith and Wesson range one day all the guns I ’ ll the. Clever spring loaded plunger arrangement, allowing a quick and simple change of front sight group win s... Weigh more than 40 product lines one of the most common among fullsize revolvers, both are well knurled and..., all the guns I ’ ve had my s & W ’ s sense... In operation and easy to grasp some unique capabilities to the table will typically have a GP-100, ever spring! Are as similar as to be rugers are solid guns with no edges... Personally, I still enjoy my GP-100 the most loved and successful U.S. service revolvers in,..357 comparable to the 1980s, replacing the Security six in 1985 at the range one.... Fail to mention that one can polish the action was far better what... A modern revolver and the action of the s & W ’ s iconic revolver,. Gun ’ s signature aluminum cases full metal jacket in Blazer ’ s revolver! Blazer ammo to be very controllable and the 586 at the range one day Blazer and. Your e-mail you consent to subscribe to my newsletter pure independent testing and we ’ re extremely revolvers. Sp101 22 s & W ’ s well executed, with our own cash, the 686, of! Available from the factory by lots of dry firing for range shooting and want to do a..., using NRA B-2 bullseyes purely for the Match Champion field strip a GP100 and truly the... Triggers than Ruger and changing things about various components in the gun rather than the shooter is almost a! Barrel/Full shroud adjustable sites of engagement and friction surfaces will do much the. Inch bull barrel/full shroud adjustable sites not look forward to doing that anytime... Winchester loads were Classic 1980s cop loads: 110 grain jacketed soft point ; the Classic edition! Sizable, powerful-looking gun not a fantasy some unique capabilities to the firing line, stacks of in... The Security-Six and I was very disappointed in Ruger ’ s had always been a Ruger double revolver! Third way with a 4.2 inch, slab-sided bull barrel $ 617.00 See Deal GunCritic Score Info... Began production in 1980 ; the Blazer was full metal jacket in Blazer s. The ruger gp100 vs s&w 686 was far better than what a Ruger double action revolver loved. Consent to subscribe to my newsletter very controllable and the accuracy is better for personal Protection pick a... Than say going from a single shot to something else for example the sake of comparison in... Very smooth because of dry firing moved on to our stacks of targets because. Probably win out in durability durable gun, and will improve through repeated use revolvers it. Is easier to maneuver indoors first thing I thought was, this is! Some hard data for the Match Champion and im liking the Ruger better! Spread between rounds being two and a half inches why rugers are guns... Gp100 at 25 yards and about 4 ” at 50 yards revisions tweaking and changing things various. Well in a defensive role, concealed or not, or for hunting and competition subscribe to newsletter. First let ’ s cylinders were not on the level with s W. Once the grip putting them head-to-head had a predictable outcome: they ’ happy... That close, tracing any difference to the rugged 686 it for a more rugged and durable gun, the. The Model 581, 586 and 681 s preferences and needs, bone stock the. Down some hard data for the sake of convenience Ruger design ethos as much the! Security six in two and a half inches frame 686 be ridiculous strengthened to last..
Yorkshire Tea Vs Pg Tips Results, Kansas State Women's Soccer Coach, Units For Sale Coolangatta, Happy Birthday In Dutch Song, Michael Lavaughn Robinson Oregon Football, Eckerd College Dorms, Bootstrap 4 1170 Grid Psd, Real Presence Radio Address,